<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ultimate Boxing Results &amp; Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Catch up on results or up and coming boxing matches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by lewis richards</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>no doubt about it tyson THE GREATEST boxer to have ever lived he destroyed all great fghters like sphynx n all so every1 slagin mike off needs to do a history lesson! 

miike tyson &#039;&#039;iron mike&#039;&#039; is an idol to all boxers with his amence power n speed and agility name 1 person as strong as tyson in he heavy weight division.........ow yh theres no1!!!!!

and one more thing to say who in gods name put the fear of god like tyson did in his opponents no1 everyone how got in the ing with him knew they were guna lose or lay on the canvus no doubt about it 

He is and always will be the greatest heavy weight champion to have ever lived if not in your book but in mine and alot of peoples&#039;s to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no doubt about it tyson THE GREATEST boxer to have ever lived he destroyed all great fghters like sphynx n all so every1 slagin mike off needs to do a history lesson! </p>
<p>miike tyson &#8221;iron mike&#8221; is an idol to all boxers with his amence power n speed and agility name 1 person as strong as tyson in he heavy weight division&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;ow yh theres no1!!!!!</p>
<p>and one more thing to say who in gods name put the fear of god like tyson did in his opponents no1 everyone how got in the ing with him knew they were guna lose or lay on the canvus no doubt about it </p>
<p>He is and always will be the greatest heavy weight champion to have ever lived if not in your book but in mine and alot of peoples&#8217;s to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxing for the 27th and 28th April 2007 by Music-Band</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/boxing-for-the-27th-and-28th-april-2007/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Music-Band</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/boxing-for-the-27th-and-28th-april-2007/#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Hey 
 
I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool. 
Currently im running and adult site:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnvnation.biz/queries.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reachton&lt;/a&gt; 
k, just want to say hi :) 
Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey </p>
<p>I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool.<br />
Currently im running and adult site:<a href="http://www.vnvnation.biz/queries.html" rel="nofollow">Reachton</a><br />
k, just want to say hi <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by John Tandy</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>All the points you make are fair enough, and thank you for taking the time to comment, as I have said it is always down to personal preferences.  As with my list I can also pick holes in yours

1. Ali - No doubt was up there in nearly everyone’s top 10, is always going to be in the top 5, just not my number 1

2. Jack Johnson - For the time he boxed in he was a great, but in my opinion the standard just wasn’t there, he build his record by beating inexperienced fighter, a lot of them he had huge weight advantages against.  However no doubt was a great but for me doesn’t make the top 10 

3. Holmes - Again top fighter and great technique, a little boring to watch through and was also around when there was not much in the way of challenges, you could argue that the era is nearly as poor as it is now

4. Joe Louis - No arguments here nearly had at 4 myslef

5. Jim Jeffries - Great athlete but again not really top 10 material, but as I have said this era I just can’t say as all the fights were written up by various people and I haven’t seen them box so can’t include them, before boxing was really an organised sport

6. Tyson - There are few that wouldn’t have Tyson in there top ten, let himself down in a big way, but surely the most gifted and awesome heavyweight ever.  Mentally lacking but still is one of the greatest ever to step in a ring

7. Bowe - Let down by discipline could have been a lot higher

8. Frasier - Great warrior and it was a toss up between him and Klitschko for the number 10 position, just think Klitschko would have dominated in any era and I realise he has not been tested by the best but in my opinion he just edged Frasier into the top 10, and how I have been slated for that decision, but I stand by it. 

9. Langford - OK, his record cannot be confirmed could have lost anywhere between 30-50 bouts, and drawn as many, yes he probably won 200 bouts but it was before the time in my opinion that boxing really emerged as a organised sport, as with Jack Johnson, fought so many times and so often record doesn’t really do them justice.

10. Liston - I saw Liston as a bully who didn’t fight the top guys, he beat up Patterson who was a great light Heavyweight but not the best Heavyweight.  The only real name on his record is Ali and in my opinion he threw both fights, no way I could have him in the top 10

In regard to your comments on my top 10 

Vitali Klitschko - Has never beaten anyone. And is champ in arguably the weakest ever era. 

Fair enough but I think he is a supreme athlete that would have done well in any era and if it wasn’t for injuries would be at the top now even if it’s not the best Era

George Foreman - Was too easy to hit as Ali proved. Came back and beat a very weak champion in Moore. Foreman couldn’t beat Morrison who as hardly earth shattering. 

Fair enough, but he did beat Joe Frazier twice the first time for the title, Moorer is a decent fighter but really a blown up light Heavy where he really dominated.  He was 44 when he fought Morrison

Riddick Bowe - definitely a top ten all time great. Shame his self discipline let him down. 

Yep, could have been a lot higher

Larry Holmes - No doubt about it. Deservedly in the top ten. 

Yep

Joe Louis - worthy of top ten maybe should have been higher up the list.

Was tempted, but settled for him at 6, wouldn’t argue that he could have been higher

Evander Holfield - great light heavyweight…just outside the top ten heavyweights because he failed v lewis. 

Unbeatable Cruiserweight, stepped up and did the job with limited size, beat Tyson twice, and a long list of former champions.  Did get a draw with Lewis in the first fight if a little undeserved.  True warrior needs to be in the top 10

Lennox Lewis - fought washed up fighters and couldnt take a punch.

Bit harsh, Only lost twice, McCall is a good puncher and caught him, Rahman caught him with his hands down with a shot that would have knocked out most heavyweights, he did fight both men and again and win.  Fought some great fighters and beat them a lot of them in their prime, sorry disagree with you on this one.

Muhammad Ali - was number 1 in my opinion. Had the lot.

Fair enough, just don’t enjoy watching his fights  

Rocky Marciano - fought washed up fighters and in a very weak era. He saw Liston on the horizon and retired before they could fight. 

Again bit harsh, agree that he was a little limited but had a massive heart and retired undefeated, still holds the record for that and didn’t duck anyone.  Liston didn’t fight for a title until 7 years after Marciano retired.  He did fight the likes of Louis, Walcott, Moore, Charles and Lastarza.  So wasn’t a bad era

Mike Tyson - in the top ten for his first five years in boxing. Lost it as we know but definately a great. Funny but he never seemed to do well against taller fighters like Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield. 

Yep could have been a lot better, fought Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield on his downhill spiral.  Did he do enough to be number 1, there is an argument there.  But if you speak to a lot of professional boxers Tyson is one of their favourite boxers and one who has inspired so many people with his ability speed and power.

Again I am not saying I am saying you option is wrong, it is just different to my own.  You obviously know what you are talking about, but that is what makes this subject so interesting, all experts in boxing generally come up with a different top 10, usually the same fighters turn up but in different orders.

In regard to the Ali comment regarding who he beat - 

Ali beat: 

Paterson - Blown up light heavy, destroyed by Liston twice

Liston - Threw both fights

Frasier - Great warrior 

Norton - Good fighter beat Ali once, destroyed by Foreman

Foreman - Outfoxed by Ali but never the less good fighter

Shavers - Great but lost too many

Williams - Good again lost 2 many

Bonavena - Same again

Spinks - Sorry doesn’t deserve to be on this list, did beat a washed up Ali and then Ali scrapped the re-match but far from great

You could write a list for a lot of fighters in the list some better than others, I think you can argue the facts all day, just like the era at the moment is a lot worse than what it used to be, but you have to bear in mind training, diet etc have improved also technique, fighters in past years used to get hit with most of the shots that are thrown at them, generally fighters these days hit harder and are more courteous of getting hit, due to this fact so the fights aren’t as good to watch it doesn’t mean they are poor boxers.  I would put my house on most fighters these days beating the likes of Jack Johnson, but for his time he was a great fighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the points you make are fair enough, and thank you for taking the time to comment, as I have said it is always down to personal preferences.  As with my list I can also pick holes in yours</p>
<p>1. Ali &#8211; No doubt was up there in nearly everyone’s top 10, is always going to be in the top 5, just not my number 1</p>
<p>2. Jack Johnson &#8211; For the time he boxed in he was a great, but in my opinion the standard just wasn’t there, he build his record by beating inexperienced fighter, a lot of them he had huge weight advantages against.  However no doubt was a great but for me doesn’t make the top 10 </p>
<p>3. Holmes &#8211; Again top fighter and great technique, a little boring to watch through and was also around when there was not much in the way of challenges, you could argue that the era is nearly as poor as it is now</p>
<p>4. Joe Louis &#8211; No arguments here nearly had at 4 myslef</p>
<p>5. Jim Jeffries &#8211; Great athlete but again not really top 10 material, but as I have said this era I just can’t say as all the fights were written up by various people and I haven’t seen them box so can’t include them, before boxing was really an organised sport</p>
<p>6. Tyson &#8211; There are few that wouldn’t have Tyson in there top ten, let himself down in a big way, but surely the most gifted and awesome heavyweight ever.  Mentally lacking but still is one of the greatest ever to step in a ring</p>
<p>7. Bowe &#8211; Let down by discipline could have been a lot higher</p>
<p>8. Frasier &#8211; Great warrior and it was a toss up between him and Klitschko for the number 10 position, just think Klitschko would have dominated in any era and I realise he has not been tested by the best but in my opinion he just edged Frasier into the top 10, and how I have been slated for that decision, but I stand by it. </p>
<p>9. Langford &#8211; OK, his record cannot be confirmed could have lost anywhere between 30-50 bouts, and drawn as many, yes he probably won 200 bouts but it was before the time in my opinion that boxing really emerged as a organised sport, as with Jack Johnson, fought so many times and so often record doesn’t really do them justice.</p>
<p>10. Liston &#8211; I saw Liston as a bully who didn’t fight the top guys, he beat up Patterson who was a great light Heavyweight but not the best Heavyweight.  The only real name on his record is Ali and in my opinion he threw both fights, no way I could have him in the top 10</p>
<p>In regard to your comments on my top 10 </p>
<p>Vitali Klitschko &#8211; Has never beaten anyone. And is champ in arguably the weakest ever era. </p>
<p>Fair enough but I think he is a supreme athlete that would have done well in any era and if it wasn’t for injuries would be at the top now even if it’s not the best Era</p>
<p>George Foreman &#8211; Was too easy to hit as Ali proved. Came back and beat a very weak champion in Moore. Foreman couldn’t beat Morrison who as hardly earth shattering. </p>
<p>Fair enough, but he did beat Joe Frazier twice the first time for the title, Moorer is a decent fighter but really a blown up light Heavy where he really dominated.  He was 44 when he fought Morrison</p>
<p>Riddick Bowe &#8211; definitely a top ten all time great. Shame his self discipline let him down. </p>
<p>Yep, could have been a lot higher</p>
<p>Larry Holmes &#8211; No doubt about it. Deservedly in the top ten. </p>
<p>Yep</p>
<p>Joe Louis &#8211; worthy of top ten maybe should have been higher up the list.</p>
<p>Was tempted, but settled for him at 6, wouldn’t argue that he could have been higher</p>
<p>Evander Holfield &#8211; great light heavyweight…just outside the top ten heavyweights because he failed v lewis. </p>
<p>Unbeatable Cruiserweight, stepped up and did the job with limited size, beat Tyson twice, and a long list of former champions.  Did get a draw with Lewis in the first fight if a little undeserved.  True warrior needs to be in the top 10</p>
<p>Lennox Lewis &#8211; fought washed up fighters and couldnt take a punch.</p>
<p>Bit harsh, Only lost twice, McCall is a good puncher and caught him, Rahman caught him with his hands down with a shot that would have knocked out most heavyweights, he did fight both men and again and win.  Fought some great fighters and beat them a lot of them in their prime, sorry disagree with you on this one.</p>
<p>Muhammad Ali &#8211; was number 1 in my opinion. Had the lot.</p>
<p>Fair enough, just don’t enjoy watching his fights  </p>
<p>Rocky Marciano &#8211; fought washed up fighters and in a very weak era. He saw Liston on the horizon and retired before they could fight. </p>
<p>Again bit harsh, agree that he was a little limited but had a massive heart and retired undefeated, still holds the record for that and didn’t duck anyone.  Liston didn’t fight for a title until 7 years after Marciano retired.  He did fight the likes of Louis, Walcott, Moore, Charles and Lastarza.  So wasn’t a bad era</p>
<p>Mike Tyson &#8211; in the top ten for his first five years in boxing. Lost it as we know but definately a great. Funny but he never seemed to do well against taller fighters like Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield. </p>
<p>Yep could have been a lot better, fought Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield on his downhill spiral.  Did he do enough to be number 1, there is an argument there.  But if you speak to a lot of professional boxers Tyson is one of their favourite boxers and one who has inspired so many people with his ability speed and power.</p>
<p>Again I am not saying I am saying you option is wrong, it is just different to my own.  You obviously know what you are talking about, but that is what makes this subject so interesting, all experts in boxing generally come up with a different top 10, usually the same fighters turn up but in different orders.</p>
<p>In regard to the Ali comment regarding who he beat &#8211; </p>
<p>Ali beat: </p>
<p>Paterson &#8211; Blown up light heavy, destroyed by Liston twice</p>
<p>Liston &#8211; Threw both fights</p>
<p>Frasier &#8211; Great warrior </p>
<p>Norton &#8211; Good fighter beat Ali once, destroyed by Foreman</p>
<p>Foreman &#8211; Outfoxed by Ali but never the less good fighter</p>
<p>Shavers &#8211; Great but lost too many</p>
<p>Williams &#8211; Good again lost 2 many</p>
<p>Bonavena &#8211; Same again</p>
<p>Spinks &#8211; Sorry doesn’t deserve to be on this list, did beat a washed up Ali and then Ali scrapped the re-match but far from great</p>
<p>You could write a list for a lot of fighters in the list some better than others, I think you can argue the facts all day, just like the era at the moment is a lot worse than what it used to be, but you have to bear in mind training, diet etc have improved also technique, fighters in past years used to get hit with most of the shots that are thrown at them, generally fighters these days hit harder and are more courteous of getting hit, due to this fact so the fights aren’t as good to watch it doesn’t mean they are poor boxers.  I would put my house on most fighters these days beating the likes of Jack Johnson, but for his time he was a great fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by Jimmy Gloves</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Gloves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>One more point on Ali.

He fought inthe hardest era ever. Look at the guys ali beat and you will see there is no comparison. 

Ali beat: 

Paterson
Liston 
Frasier
Norton 
Foreman 
Shavers
Williams 
Bonavena
Spinks 

and many others who were real tough guys. 

Truly the hardest era in the heavyweight history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more point on Ali.</p>
<p>He fought inthe hardest era ever. Look at the guys ali beat and you will see there is no comparison. </p>
<p>Ali beat: </p>
<p>Paterson<br />
Liston<br />
Frasier<br />
Norton<br />
Foreman<br />
Shavers<br />
Williams<br />
Bonavena<br />
Spinks </p>
<p>and many others who were real tough guys. </p>
<p>Truly the hardest era in the heavyweight history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by Jimmy Gloves</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Gloves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Interesting selection. Have to disagree though. 

Here are some points to consider. 

Vitali Klitschko - Has never beaten anyone. And is champ in arguably the weakest ever era. 

George Foreman -  Was too easy to hit as Ali proved. Came back and beat a very weak champion in Moore. Foreman couldn&#039;t beat Morrison who as hardly earth shattering. 

Riddick Bowe - definitely a top ten all time great. Shame his self discipline let him down. 

Larry Holmes - No doubt about it. Deservedly in the top ten. 

Joe Louis - worthy of top ten maybe should have been higher up the list.

Evander Holfield - great light heavyweight...just outside the top ten heavyweights because he failed v lewis. 

Lennox Lewis - fought washed up fighters and couldnt take a punch.

Muhammad Ali - was number 1 in my opinion. Had the lot. 
 
Rocky Marciano - fought washed up fighters and in a very weak era. He saw Liston on the horizon and retired before they could fight. 

Mike Tyson - in the top ten for his first five years in boxing. Lost it as we know but definately a great. Funny but he never seemed to do well against taller fighters like Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield. 

My top ten

1. Ali 
2. Jack Johnson
3. Holmes
4. Joe Louis
5. Jim Jeffries
6. Tyson 
7. Bowe
8. Frasier
9. Langford 
10. Liston 
 
Bear in mind I am looking at fighters in their peak. So for example, my list goes as ...

At his peak Ali would have beaten any fighter. 

Johnston at his peak would have beaten any on them except Ali who had too much mobility and would have psyched him out before a glove was thrown. 

Tyson at his peak would have beaten Bowe, Frasier, langford and Liston but not the Jeffries, Louis, Holmes and Johnston.  

Incidentally, Demspey is not on the list because he drew the race line and refused to fight Sam Langford who he knew was the best heavyweight and but for racism would have been champion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting selection. Have to disagree though. </p>
<p>Here are some points to consider. </p>
<p>Vitali Klitschko &#8211; Has never beaten anyone. And is champ in arguably the weakest ever era. </p>
<p>George Foreman &#8211;  Was too easy to hit as Ali proved. Came back and beat a very weak champion in Moore. Foreman couldn&#8217;t beat Morrison who as hardly earth shattering. </p>
<p>Riddick Bowe &#8211; definitely a top ten all time great. Shame his self discipline let him down. </p>
<p>Larry Holmes &#8211; No doubt about it. Deservedly in the top ten. </p>
<p>Joe Louis &#8211; worthy of top ten maybe should have been higher up the list.</p>
<p>Evander Holfield &#8211; great light heavyweight&#8230;just outside the top ten heavyweights because he failed v lewis. </p>
<p>Lennox Lewis &#8211; fought washed up fighters and couldnt take a punch.</p>
<p>Muhammad Ali &#8211; was number 1 in my opinion. Had the lot. </p>
<p>Rocky Marciano &#8211; fought washed up fighters and in a very weak era. He saw Liston on the horizon and retired before they could fight. </p>
<p>Mike Tyson &#8211; in the top ten for his first five years in boxing. Lost it as we know but definately a great. Funny but he never seemed to do well against taller fighters like Douglas, Lewis and Holyfield. </p>
<p>My top ten</p>
<p>1. Ali<br />
2. Jack Johnson<br />
3. Holmes<br />
4. Joe Louis<br />
5. Jim Jeffries<br />
6. Tyson<br />
7. Bowe<br />
8. Frasier<br />
9. Langford<br />
10. Liston </p>
<p>Bear in mind I am looking at fighters in their peak. So for example, my list goes as &#8230;</p>
<p>At his peak Ali would have beaten any fighter. </p>
<p>Johnston at his peak would have beaten any on them except Ali who had too much mobility and would have psyched him out before a glove was thrown. </p>
<p>Tyson at his peak would have beaten Bowe, Frasier, langford and Liston but not the Jeffries, Louis, Holmes and Johnston.  </p>
<p>Incidentally, Demspey is not on the list because he drew the race line and refused to fight Sam Langford who he knew was the best heavyweight and but for racism would have been champion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by John Tandy</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Ok, you seem very knowledgeable thanks for the Foreman point I have rectified the mistake.  You are obviously a little nuts though, I normally correct all of the errors in the comments made but as you seem to think I have a problem with English I have left yours how it came.  You then slag off making a top ten and then do one yourself completely contradicting your beliefs, 7 of mine appear in yours, Sonny Liston was a bottle job, Earnie Shavers really ?, and as for Ron Lyle he was never even a World Champion how on earth can he be in the top 10 ever ?  Yes he lost to some good fighters but come on are you having a laugh ?  

You seem to say something and then immediately go back on it.  Thanks for taking the time for making a comment, but I am not sure how boxing writers are a disgrace to boxers ? Surely if we didn’t write about it, there would be no room for dicussion and many people wouldn’t know, I am sure the majority of your knowledge comes from books, magazines or the web as I am sure you will not have seen every fight ever.  As for what Ali did out of the ring, my judgement is for what they did in the ring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you seem very knowledgeable thanks for the Foreman point I have rectified the mistake.  You are obviously a little nuts though, I normally correct all of the errors in the comments made but as you seem to think I have a problem with English I have left yours how it came.  You then slag off making a top ten and then do one yourself completely contradicting your beliefs, 7 of mine appear in yours, Sonny Liston was a bottle job, Earnie Shavers really ?, and as for Ron Lyle he was never even a World Champion how on earth can he be in the top 10 ever ?  Yes he lost to some good fighters but come on are you having a laugh ?  </p>
<p>You seem to say something and then immediately go back on it.  Thanks for taking the time for making a comment, but I am not sure how boxing writers are a disgrace to boxers ? Surely if we didn’t write about it, there would be no room for dicussion and many people wouldn’t know, I am sure the majority of your knowledge comes from books, magazines or the web as I am sure you will not have seen every fight ever.  As for what Ali did out of the ring, my judgement is for what they did in the ring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top 10 Heavyweights in History by KAI MARSDEN</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>KAI MARSDEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/the-top-10-heavyweights-in-history/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>VERY INTERESTING BUT NOT ACEDEMICALLY INCLINED,YOU HAVE HOLES IN YOUR ENGLISH NOT TO MENTION YOUR KNOWLEGE OF RECORDS OF BOXERS.YOU ALL ARE AMETURE WANNA BE SPORTS WRITERS .fOREMAN WAS 37-0 34 KO GOING INTO THE FRAZIER FIGHT.TO ATTEST TO MY EXPERT TUTULEGE I HAVE WON EVERY BOXER KNOWLEGE CONTEST KNOWN TO MAN.yOU ALL ARE DISGRACING THOSE BOXERS AS A RESULT NOT ANY OF YOU ARE BOXING FANS BUT ARE TRYING TO DISCREDIT THE SPORT.wHAT IS THE POINT WHO MAKES THE TOP TEN OR NOT.A FIGHT OVER WHO IS NUMBER TEN OVER NUMBER 11.WELL COME ON.nUMBER ONE IS WHAT MATTERS.WITH ALL THE BOXERS UP THERE NO ONE MATCHES WHAT mUHAMMAD aLI DONE FOR THE SPORT PROMOTED THE SPORT TOOK ON THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND ONE AND SAVED AN AMERICAN SOLDIER FROM A TERRORIST DICTATOR AND IS STRUGGLING WITH A DISEASE THERE IS NO CURE FOR.aND WHO WOULD WANT TO DISCREDIT ANY FIGHTER WHO DID SO MUCH FOR THE SPORT.mUHAMMAD aLI IS THE GREATEST HANDS DONE AND NOT BECAUSE HE SAYS SO.IT IS THE KIND OF MAN HE WAS.IF ALI NEVER ENTERED THE RING AT 12 YRS HE STILL WOULD BE THE GREATEST.nONE OF THOSE OTHER FIGHTERS HAD A CHANCE GOING INTO THE RING BECAUSE THEY DID NO WHAT KIND OF GIANT THEY WERE FIGHTING.nO MAN EVER ENTERED THE RING WITH MORE HEART THAN ALI,HE ALLWAYS CAME BACK,THE ONLY THING THAT DEFEATEDALI WAS PARKINSON DUNDEE SAYS EVEN BACK IN THE THIRD FRAZIER FIGHT IT WAS SHOWING.tHERE WERE A LOT OF AWSOME FIGHTERS DOING AWSOME THINGS fOREMAN AT 45,HOLYFEILDS FOUR TITLES AT CRUSER WEIGHT MARCIANO&#039;S 49-0 YOU GUYS NO THE RECORD.bUT ALI LOST AND CAME BACK AGAINST GUYS WHO WERE AMAZING WHEN HE WAS OVER THE HILL AND HE WAS EVEN GREATER IN THE SIXTIES.1966  HE WAS UNBEATABLE.tHE ROMAN ARMY COULDN&#039;T HAVE BEATEN HIM.mY LIST THOUGH I DON&#039;T NEED ONE YOU GUYS DO,IS 
1-mUHAMMAD aLI
1 lENNOX lEWIS
lARRY hOLMES
eVANDER hOLYFEILD
gEORGE fOREMAN
jOE lOUIS 
MIKE tYSON
EARNIE SHAVERS
SONNY LISTON
RON LYLE
THE LAST THREE ALTHOUGH WEREN&#039;T CHAMPIONS WOULD BEAT ANYONE ELSE BUT MISSED OUT ON THE BIG OPPORTUNITY.sHAVERS HAD A BETTER RECORD THAN ANY OF THE BUT COULDN&#039;T OVER COME BOXERS LIKE ALI AND HOLMES BUT NEITHER COULD FOREMAN.fACE IT IF YOU DON&#039;T HAVE BOXING ABILITY YOU DON&#039;T STAND A CHANCE
kAI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY INTERESTING BUT NOT ACEDEMICALLY INCLINED,YOU HAVE HOLES IN YOUR ENGLISH NOT TO MENTION YOUR KNOWLEGE OF RECORDS OF BOXERS.YOU ALL ARE AMETURE WANNA BE SPORTS WRITERS .fOREMAN WAS 37-0 34 KO GOING INTO THE FRAZIER FIGHT.TO ATTEST TO MY EXPERT TUTULEGE I HAVE WON EVERY BOXER KNOWLEGE CONTEST KNOWN TO MAN.yOU ALL ARE DISGRACING THOSE BOXERS AS A RESULT NOT ANY OF YOU ARE BOXING FANS BUT ARE TRYING TO DISCREDIT THE SPORT.wHAT IS THE POINT WHO MAKES THE TOP TEN OR NOT.A FIGHT OVER WHO IS NUMBER TEN OVER NUMBER 11.WELL COME ON.nUMBER ONE IS WHAT MATTERS.WITH ALL THE BOXERS UP THERE NO ONE MATCHES WHAT mUHAMMAD aLI DONE FOR THE SPORT PROMOTED THE SPORT TOOK ON THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND ONE AND SAVED AN AMERICAN SOLDIER FROM A TERRORIST DICTATOR AND IS STRUGGLING WITH A DISEASE THERE IS NO CURE FOR.aND WHO WOULD WANT TO DISCREDIT ANY FIGHTER WHO DID SO MUCH FOR THE SPORT.mUHAMMAD aLI IS THE GREATEST HANDS DONE AND NOT BECAUSE HE SAYS SO.IT IS THE KIND OF MAN HE WAS.IF ALI NEVER ENTERED THE RING AT 12 YRS HE STILL WOULD BE THE GREATEST.nONE OF THOSE OTHER FIGHTERS HAD A CHANCE GOING INTO THE RING BECAUSE THEY DID NO WHAT KIND OF GIANT THEY WERE FIGHTING.nO MAN EVER ENTERED THE RING WITH MORE HEART THAN ALI,HE ALLWAYS CAME BACK,THE ONLY THING THAT DEFEATEDALI WAS PARKINSON DUNDEE SAYS EVEN BACK IN THE THIRD FRAZIER FIGHT IT WAS SHOWING.tHERE WERE A LOT OF AWSOME FIGHTERS DOING AWSOME THINGS fOREMAN AT 45,HOLYFEILDS FOUR TITLES AT CRUSER WEIGHT MARCIANO&#8217;S 49-0 YOU GUYS NO THE RECORD.bUT ALI LOST AND CAME BACK AGAINST GUYS WHO WERE AMAZING WHEN HE WAS OVER THE HILL AND HE WAS EVEN GREATER IN THE SIXTIES.1966  HE WAS UNBEATABLE.tHE ROMAN ARMY COULDN&#8217;T HAVE BEATEN HIM.mY LIST THOUGH I DON&#8217;T NEED ONE YOU GUYS DO,IS<br />
1-mUHAMMAD aLI<br />
1 lENNOX lEWIS<br />
lARRY hOLMES<br />
eVANDER hOLYFEILD<br />
gEORGE fOREMAN<br />
jOE lOUIS<br />
MIKE tYSON<br />
EARNIE SHAVERS<br />
SONNY LISTON<br />
RON LYLE<br />
THE LAST THREE ALTHOUGH WEREN&#8217;T CHAMPIONS WOULD BEAT ANYONE ELSE BUT MISSED OUT ON THE BIG OPPORTUNITY.sHAVERS HAD A BETTER RECORD THAN ANY OF THE BUT COULDN&#8217;T OVER COME BOXERS LIKE ALI AND HOLMES BUT NEITHER COULD FOREMAN.fACE IT IF YOU DON&#8217;T HAVE BOXING ABILITY YOU DON&#8217;T STAND A CHANCE<br />
kAI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxing v Ultimate Fighting &#8211; is there room for both ? by John Tandy</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/boxing-v-ultimate-fighting-is-there-room-for-both/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/boxing-v-ultimate-fighting-is-there-room-for-both/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to comment, you make some really good points, only recently has Kermit Cintron suggested he is going to have a go at UFC, as before he was a boxer he was offered a wrestling scholarship and I think he should do well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment, you make some really good points, only recently has Kermit Cintron suggested he is going to have a go at UFC, as before he was a boxer he was offered a wrestling scholarship and I think he should do well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxing v Ultimate Fighting &#8211; is there room for both ? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/boxing-v-ultimate-fighting-is-there-room-for-both/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/boxing-v-ultimate-fighting-is-there-room-for-both/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I myself have done martail arts in my youth and competed and then gone on to compete in amateur boxing bouts. I have similar views to yourself on the above subjects. I would like to add that the UFC as a promoter  seems to be actually teaching the old school boxing companies a thing or two in advertisng, build ups and shows. That can only be great for a boxing revival as the boxing old guard have to compete against ufc a little now to prove they are as good/better. The old formula of a title fight with little knowns (unless you are a follower) on the undercard would be best to change to give each fighter a quick summary/background for tv spectators and maybe big screen live venue viewers(as in ufc), this makes the anticipation and interest greater for each fight so even if the main event turns out to be a damp squib then all is not lost...

One more point - there would be a big class difference in striking from a top ufc guy to a top boxer, if the &#039;top&#039; boxer learnt some good take down defence and a little wrestling he would probably go far. check out top thai boxers though for different stance to traditional boxing which would invite leg kicks. Its a difficult one but I think if you are a good wrestler with good boxing/thai boxing you will do well in the ufc. In the beginning it was all gracie bjj but really starting to shift to the striking game, even the fighters seem to prefer it as well as the viewers. Maybe there is more glory involved in knocking someone out than submitting them too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I myself have done martail arts in my youth and competed and then gone on to compete in amateur boxing bouts. I have similar views to yourself on the above subjects. I would like to add that the UFC as a promoter  seems to be actually teaching the old school boxing companies a thing or two in advertisng, build ups and shows. That can only be great for a boxing revival as the boxing old guard have to compete against ufc a little now to prove they are as good/better. The old formula of a title fight with little knowns (unless you are a follower) on the undercard would be best to change to give each fighter a quick summary/background for tv spectators and maybe big screen live venue viewers(as in ufc), this makes the anticipation and interest greater for each fight so even if the main event turns out to be a damp squib then all is not lost&#8230;</p>
<p>One more point &#8211; there would be a big class difference in striking from a top ufc guy to a top boxer, if the &#8216;top&#8217; boxer learnt some good take down defence and a little wrestling he would probably go far. check out top thai boxers though for different stance to traditional boxing which would invite leg kicks. Its a difficult one but I think if you are a good wrestler with good boxing/thai boxing you will do well in the ufc. In the beginning it was all gracie bjj but really starting to shift to the striking game, even the fighters seem to prefer it as well as the viewers. Maybe there is more glory involved in knocking someone out than submitting them too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CONTENDER 3 England v USA by steve</title>
		<link>http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/contender-3-england-v-usa/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbtandy.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/contender-3-england-v-usa/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>its an american show and has purposly picked not very good english boxers!! im english and have never heard of any of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its an american show and has purposly picked not very good english boxers!! im english and have never heard of any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
